Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Winkler <pw_lists@...>
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Subject: Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2003 - 4:50 pm

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 04:55:41PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:


I don't know why I didn't think of this before, but I'm going to

look into getting SpamAssasin in the pipe *before * mailman,

which can then require moderator approval for anything spammish.


-- 


Paul Winkler

http://www.slinkp.com

Look! Up in the sky! It's SPIFFY MIDGET!

(random hero from isometric.spaceninja.com)
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:28 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, , (Tue Aug 19, 2:22 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Alfons Adriaensen, (Thu Aug 14, 2:28 pm)
Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should ..., Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 2:25 pm)
Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sho..., Örjan, (Thu Aug 14, 3:29 pm)
Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sho..., Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 4:25 pm)
Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sho..., , (Tue Aug 19, 2:27 pm)
Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sho..., , (Thu Aug 14, 4:42 pm)
Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sho..., Frank Barknecht, (Thu Aug 14, 3:10 pm)
Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sho..., Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 4:50 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, John Littler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:59 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Axel Müller, (Thu Aug 14, 11:40 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Luke Yelavich, (Thu Aug 14, 8:15 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Robert Jonsson, (Thu Aug 14, 7:50 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Jack O'Quin, (Thu Aug 14, 1:04 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, ljp, (Thu Aug 14, 7:41 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, , (Thu Aug 14, 4:00 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Tarragon Allen, (Thu Aug 14, 8:01 am)