Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2003 - 4:25 pm

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:57:12PM +0200, ?rjan Askhult wrote:

That is true, but in practice that does not seem to be happening.
We're just getting a bunch of spam from non-subscribed addresses.

--

Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Look! Up in the sky! It's WIZARD PROTO FEDORA!
(random hero from isometric.spaceninja.com)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:28 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Alfons Adriaensen, (Thu Aug 14, 2:28 pm)
Re: Reason for current policy, was Re: [linux-audio-dev] Sho..., Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 4:25 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, John Littler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:59 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Axel Müller, (Thu Aug 14, 11:40 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Luke Yelavich, (Thu Aug 14, 8:15 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Robert Jonsson, (Thu Aug 14, 7:50 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Jack O'Quin, (Thu Aug 14, 1:04 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Tarragon Allen, (Thu Aug 14, 8:01 am)