Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Cc: Paul Winkler <pw_lists@...>
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2003 - 1:04 pm

Robert Jonsson writes:

> There is some crossposting occuring that, atleast sometimes, is

This actually works fairly well already (in reverse).

I did reply-all to a message sent to both LAD and LAU (without
realizing it) back when I was not subscribed to LAU. I got a sensible
response saying that since I was not subscribed my message was
awaiting moderator approval. The moderator approved my message after
perhaps half a day.

Once I realized what had happened, I subscribed to LAU as well.
Problem solved. :-)

So, I would vote++ for the suggestion to moderate non-member postings.
--
Jack O'Quin
Austin, Texas, USA

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:28 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Alfons Adriaensen, (Thu Aug 14, 2:28 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, John Littler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:59 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Axel Müller, (Thu Aug 14, 11:40 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Luke Yelavich, (Thu Aug 14, 8:15 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Robert Jonsson, (Thu Aug 14, 7:50 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Jack O'Quin, (Thu Aug 14, 1:04 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Tarragon Allen, (Thu Aug 14, 8:01 am)