[linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2003 - 7:28 am

Hi folks, your friendly temporary list-admin here.
(Joern's on vacation and I'm filling in.)

We seem to be getting quite a lot of spam lately.
Currently the list is "open" - non-members can post.

I'd like to take an informal poll:

Should the LAD list remain totally open, or should
non-member postings require moderator approval?

I should point out that the LAU list requires approval
for non-member postings, and it seems to be no problem
in my very-limited experience managing the lists:
I check the pending-approval queue at least once a day, find
nothing but spam, and throw it away. Approving a legit non-member
posting would be trivially easy.

--

Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Look! Up in the sky! It's GILDED THANATOS MYRKSKOG!
(random hero from isometric.spaceninja.com)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Paul Winkler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:28 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Alfons Adriaensen, (Thu Aug 14, 2:28 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, John Littler, (Thu Aug 14, 7:59 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Axel Müller, (Thu Aug 14, 11:40 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Luke Yelavich, (Thu Aug 14, 8:15 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Robert Jonsson, (Thu Aug 14, 7:50 am)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Jack O'Quin, (Thu Aug 14, 1:04 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-dev] Should the list be members-only?, Tarragon Allen, (Thu Aug 14, 8:01 am)