Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <consortium@...>
Date: Saturday, April 21, 2012 - 12:53 am

On Fri, April 20, 2012 11:21 pm, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:

Do you dislike all advertising or just advertising that is on the web?
What specific issues do you have with web advertising. It would be helpful
for building policy guidelines.

So far we have identified these concerns:

1: Tracking
2: Offending existing non corporate sponsors - Is this really an issue?
which sponsors would stop supporting Linux Audio if we allowed advertising
on specific sub domains? Don't Universities receive corporate funding
anymore? Does that mean all bars and nightclubs that host Linux Musicians
should also stop taking sponsorship to make ends meet? How far do we go if
we decide that advertising is not an acceptable way of generating funds
for consortium requirements?

> let's not go there. the whole thing is a bureaucratic nightmare and the

What is the pain exactly?

There are just a few things that need to be done in order to make this
happen.

1: Allow select subdomains to be hosted on different servers. So far no
one seems to have a specific problem with that request.

2: Agree on a policy that sets specific guidelines for the kinds of
advertising we would be prepared to accept. Just a simple discussion that
can be had over the coming weeks/months.

3: Agree on a way to manage any income received. Pretty simple process as
far as I can tell and doesn't require anyone else to make any effort at
all.

4: Populate some pages with links/ads that meet our guidelines. Again this
does not require anyone else's effort or time.

5: Get on with our lives and see where the experiment takes us over the
next decade or so.

> as an aside: even though i'm perfectly willing to accept patrick's

SEO is simply a way to increase page ranking. It is a perfectly legitimate
business practice and doesn't have to be spam. The page is an old page
with a lot of useful keywords and a high ranking which makes it a viable
location to place a link. This ad in particular is a single text link and
would cause minimal impact on the content. In addition it has only been
requested for a period of 1 year.

> if there is any need for pocket money (and so far, this is what we're

I concede that this particular offer is a small start but the discussion
is not about having pocket money for server maintainance at LAO. It about
allowing ourselves to generate an income by leveraging some content that
is hosted under the LAO domain as a product rather than a gratis service
to the community. All the content I am proposing as suitable has been
carefully compiled by me over the past 10 years and is released to the
public domain.

I don't see how advertising on *some of the subdomains/content* that we
host is going to ruin our reputation. It is simply a way to increase
funding and could actually motivate people to make more active
contributions if we are able to reward them financially for their efforts
instead of expecting everyone to work for free. That is a nice thing to do
but not everyone has the luxury of having enough time/money to volunteer.

Considering the state of the economy and that there are several people in
the community that we could potentially help make ends meet if we had a
regular flow of income to keep them motivated I think it is a callous
disregard for our potential as a community focused organisation if we
restrict ourselves to the high ground and expect people to do everything
for the love of it.

By the way I don't see anyone complaining when companies like Ableton
sponsor events like the LAC and plaster their name everywhere. If anything
people were very happy with that association and have even gone so far as
to publish the keynote from the director of Ableton explaining why he
*will never support* a Linux version of Ableton Live.

We have a clear track record of allowing advertising and taking money from
audio companies that wanted to support us financially so why should we be
worried about ads on some of the subdomains. Especially if these pages are
considered old and unuseful which clearly is wrong if we expand the
allowable uses for content hosted under the LAO domain.

--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
_______________________________________________
Consortium mailing list
Consortium@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/consortium

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Consortium] Re: linuxaudio.org and GStreamer, Daniel James, (Wed Jan 21, 10:30 pm)
[Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Daniel James, (Mon Sep 20, 4:00 pm)
[Consortium] Re: linuxsampler and oneshotsampler, Daniel James, (Fri Mar 18, 3:27 pm)
[Consortium] fao Paul White: Letter for publication, Daniel James, (Tue Jun 21, 2:31 pm)
[Consortium] Sounds Expo 2006, Daniel James, (Thu Dec 1, 10:08 pm)
[Consortium] Linuxaudio.org updates, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat Mar 18, 12:24 am)
[Consortium] Misc. updates, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat May 13, 4:26 am)
[Consortium] Call for all LA projects, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Mon Jul 3, 6:13 pm)
[Consortium] Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Aug 27, 4:36 pm)
[Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Cory K., (Mon Nov 12, 3:25 pm)
[Consortium] LAC 2009, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Oct 27, 3:48 pm)
[Consortium] food for thought, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat Jan 3, 8:31 pm)
[Consortium] [ANN] Canorus applied as Mentoring organization..., Reinhard Katzmann, (Fri Mar 13, 12:20 am)
Re: [Consortium] linux audio and what have you ..., Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Thu May 7, 4:53 pm)
[Consortium] delta 66, problems, richard.bown@blueyonder.co.uk..., (Tue Jul 7, 8:11 am)
Re: [Consortium] Consortium Digest, Vol 32, Issue 1, Ebrahim Mayat, (Tue Oct 13, 4:56 pm)
[Consortium] Linux Audio Conference 2010, Marc Groenewegen, (Mon Nov 23, 10:01 am)
Re: [Consortium] [LAA] Composition Competition, Marc Groenewegen, (Fri Apr 2, 5:58 pm)
[Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Thorsten Wilms, (Thu Sep 30, 7:28 am)
[Consortium] ANN: Upcoming L2Ork tour of Europe, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Mon May 9, 6:58 am)
[Consortium] linuxaudio.org network outage, Robin Gareus, (Tue Sep 27, 8:11 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Fri Apr 20, 12:03 pm)
[Consortium] LAO scheduled downtime, Robin Gareus, (Wed Sep 26, 3:12 pm)
[Consortium] Fwd: Scheduled maintenance outage, Robin Gareus, (Tue Mar 5, 7:07 pm)
[Consortium] limiting email traffic, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 29, 3:53 am)
[Consortium] , Badoo, (Tue Nov 19, 9:31 am)
[Consortium] ANN: 2014 Spring DISIS event, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Wed Apr 30, 12:36 am)
Re: [Consortium] limiting email traffic, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Oct 29, 7:35 am)
Re: [Consortium] limiting email traffic, Bent Bisballe Nyeng, (Tue Oct 29, 7:13 am)
Re: [Consortium] limiting email traffic, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Oct 29, 7:19 am)
Re: [Consortium] limiting email traffic, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 29, 1:09 pm)
Re: [Consortium] LAO scheduled downtime, Robin Gareus, (Wed Sep 26, 5:06 pm)
Re: [Consortium] LAO scheduled downtime, Robin Gareus, (Wed Sep 26, 4:24 pm)
Re: [Consortium] LAO scheduled downtime, Jeremy Jongepier, (Wed Sep 26, 6:06 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat Apr 21, 9:29 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Andreas Kuckartz, (Sun Apr 22, 7:59 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Apr 22, 2:47 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Fri Apr 20, 9:23 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Apr 21, 12:53 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Robin Gareus, (Sat Apr 21, 10:09 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Apr 22, 2:34 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Robin Gareus, (Sun Apr 22, 9:18 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Apr 22, 9:41 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Apr 22, 4:53 pm)
Re: [Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 30, 7:42 am)
Re: [Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 30, 7:53 am)
Re: [Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Daniel James, (Thu Sep 30, 9:37 am)
Re: [Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Robin Gareus, (Thu Sep 30, 8:00 pm)
[Consortium] LAC2010 Call for music, Marc Groenewegen, (Thu Jan 7, 10:35 am)
[Consortium] LAC Times, Marc Groenewegen, (Tue Feb 16, 6:49 pm)
Re: [Consortium] food for thought, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Jan 4, 2:55 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Daniel James, (Wed Nov 14, 10:39 am)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Wed Nov 14, 3:19 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Nov 14, 10:59 am)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Pieter Palmers, (Mon Nov 12, 5:21 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Nov 13, 10:05 am)
Re: [Consortium] Misc. updates, Daniel James, (Mon May 15, 2:29 pm)
RE: [Consortium] Misc. updates, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Tue May 16, 11:15 am)
Re: [Consortium] fao Paul White: Letter for publication, Steve Harris, (Tue Jun 21, 2:41 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Andrea Glorioso, (Tue Sep 28, 11:04 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Daniel James, (Wed Sep 29, 3:01 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Andrea Glorioso, (Thu Sep 30, 3:23 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Sili Attila, (Thu Sep 30, 6:54 pm)