Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <consortium@...>
Date: Friday, April 20, 2012 - 12:03 pm

On Fri, April 20, 2012 11:10 am, Daniel James wrote:

I don't see how advertising on some of the subdomains will stop any of
those institutions from continuing to support the goals of the Consortium.
If that was the case then all Universities would have to do *everything*
using not for profit solutions. I seriously doubt that the Universities of
the world want people and businesses to do everything for free. While that
is a personal political choice should the Consortium have a political
agenda against capitalism?

> If there are new companies that would like to support our work, there

We should be offering those options already as that would give them access
to our immediate community. How then do we let the world know about their
support? One standard way is to provide promotional opportunities across
our online content.

Advertising and online promotions through a Linux Digital channel will
give companies exposure to anyone who happens to drop by any of the online
locations we place their advertisements. If we are going to restrict
ourselves to only focusing on institutions and people who are already part
of the community then we are missing a big opportunity for growth.

While a large part of the Linux Audio community is built on the efforts
and support of Universities and volunteers it seems like cutting our nose
to spite our face by restricting ourselves from providing support and
marketing opportunities to businesses that want to have that brand
association or leverage off the SEO potential from our combined and
continuing efforts on building out our content over the years.

> The online video channel idea sounds like it could be viable, but

Youtube advertising relies on mass market principals. Our core "selling"
point is that we have valuable brand association. This gives us the
ability to set specific rates for allowing companies to associate their
brand with ours. Another opportunity we present is access to a dedicated
bunch of eyeballs. However it will work to our advantage too if we have
highly recognised brands associated with our content. Whether you like it
or not people who are new to Linux Audio will feel more confident in
taking a leap if they see brands they recognise.

> I would suggest looking at creating video tutorials on cross-platform

That could be useful but I don't have the time to make many videos myself
at the moment. However there is scope for other people to contribute
content for this purpose. There is already a lot out there in that regard
but I haven't had the time to collate it all and post it anywhere. I have
considered a section on lmv for tutorials but I am leaning towards a new
subdomain for that purpose. i.e journal.lao

> You may need permission from software authors to monetize videos

That is a very unusual take on things. It might become an issue but I see
that as a very low risk. If anyone was upset about their software being
used to make videos or articles that are also hosted on sites with paid
advertising then we could provide a contact form for them to get in touch
with us for removal.

Did you or Dave have any issues with clearing rights for screenshots in
the books and articles that you have published professionally? That would
be useful information for an FAQ.

>>> Next to that, my personal take on advertising on linuaudio.org is that

Sure, we can have our own tracking/analytics if we choose to. I haven't
made any plans for any analytics or tracking but I think we have an
opportunity to provide a complete solution for any member of the community
to integrate into their website and help the channel expand. That would
have to come at a later date though and would be dependant on making some
cash first.

--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
_______________________________________________
Consortium mailing list
Consortium@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/consortium

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Consortium] Re: linuxaudio.org and GStreamer, Daniel James, (Wed Jan 21, 10:30 pm)
[Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Daniel James, (Mon Sep 20, 4:00 pm)
[Consortium] Re: linuxsampler and oneshotsampler, Daniel James, (Fri Mar 18, 3:27 pm)
[Consortium] fao Paul White: Letter for publication, Daniel James, (Tue Jun 21, 2:31 pm)
[Consortium] Sounds Expo 2006, Daniel James, (Thu Dec 1, 10:08 pm)
[Consortium] Linuxaudio.org updates, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat Mar 18, 12:24 am)
[Consortium] Misc. updates, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat May 13, 4:26 am)
[Consortium] Call for all LA projects, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Mon Jul 3, 6:13 pm)
[Consortium] Re: [LAU] Categorizing Ladspa plugins?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Aug 27, 4:36 pm)
[Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Cory K., (Mon Nov 12, 3:25 pm)
[Consortium] LAC 2009, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Oct 27, 3:48 pm)
[Consortium] food for thought, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat Jan 3, 8:31 pm)
[Consortium] [ANN] Canorus applied as Mentoring organization..., Reinhard Katzmann, (Fri Mar 13, 12:20 am)
Re: [Consortium] linux audio and what have you ..., Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Thu May 7, 4:53 pm)
[Consortium] delta 66, problems, richard.bown@blueyonder.co.uk..., (Tue Jul 7, 8:11 am)
Re: [Consortium] Consortium Digest, Vol 32, Issue 1, Ebrahim Mayat, (Tue Oct 13, 4:56 pm)
[Consortium] Linux Audio Conference 2010, Marc Groenewegen, (Mon Nov 23, 10:01 am)
Re: [Consortium] [LAA] Composition Competition, Marc Groenewegen, (Fri Apr 2, 5:58 pm)
[Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Thorsten Wilms, (Thu Sep 30, 7:28 am)
[Consortium] ANN: Upcoming L2Ork tour of Europe, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Mon May 9, 6:58 am)
[Consortium] linuxaudio.org network outage, Robin Gareus, (Tue Sep 27, 8:11 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Fri Apr 20, 12:03 pm)
[Consortium] LAO scheduled downtime, Robin Gareus, (Wed Sep 26, 3:12 pm)
[Consortium] Fwd: Scheduled maintenance outage, Robin Gareus, (Tue Mar 5, 7:07 pm)
[Consortium] limiting email traffic, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 29, 3:53 am)
[Consortium] , Badoo, (Tue Nov 19, 9:31 am)
[Consortium] ANN: 2014 Spring DISIS event, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Wed Apr 30, 12:36 am)
Re: [Consortium] limiting email traffic, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Oct 29, 7:35 am)
Re: [Consortium] limiting email traffic, Bent Bisballe Nyeng, (Tue Oct 29, 7:13 am)
Re: [Consortium] limiting email traffic, Patrick Shirkey, (Tue Oct 29, 7:19 am)
Re: [Consortium] limiting email traffic, Robin Gareus, (Tue Oct 29, 1:09 pm)
Re: [Consortium] LAO scheduled downtime, Robin Gareus, (Wed Sep 26, 5:06 pm)
Re: [Consortium] LAO scheduled downtime, Robin Gareus, (Wed Sep 26, 4:24 pm)
Re: [Consortium] LAO scheduled downtime, Jeremy Jongepier, (Wed Sep 26, 6:06 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat Apr 21, 9:29 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Andreas Kuckartz, (Sun Apr 22, 7:59 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Apr 22, 2:47 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Fri Apr 20, 9:23 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Sat Apr 21, 12:53 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Robin Gareus, (Sat Apr 21, 10:09 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Apr 22, 2:34 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Robin Gareus, (Sun Apr 22, 9:18 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Apr 22, 9:41 am)
Re: [Consortium] Advertising Policy - linuxaudio.org, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Sun Apr 22, 4:53 pm)
Re: [Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 30, 7:42 am)
Re: [Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Patrick Shirkey, (Thu Sep 30, 7:53 am)
Re: [Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Daniel James, (Thu Sep 30, 9:37 am)
Re: [Consortium] [Fwd: lad.linuxaudio.org], Robin Gareus, (Thu Sep 30, 8:00 pm)
[Consortium] LAC2010 Call for music, Marc Groenewegen, (Thu Jan 7, 10:35 am)
[Consortium] LAC Times, Marc Groenewegen, (Tue Feb 16, 6:49 pm)
Re: [Consortium] food for thought, Patrick Shirkey, (Sun Jan 4, 2:55 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Daniel James, (Wed Nov 14, 10:39 am)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Wed Nov 14, 3:19 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Wed Nov 14, 10:59 am)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Pieter Palmers, (Mon Nov 12, 5:21 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Benefit of Compiz to audio work?, Marc-Olivier Barre, (Tue Nov 13, 10:05 am)
Re: [Consortium] Misc. updates, Daniel James, (Mon May 15, 2:29 pm)
RE: [Consortium] Misc. updates, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Tue May 16, 11:15 am)
Re: [Consortium] fao Paul White: Letter for publication, Steve Harris, (Tue Jun 21, 2:41 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Andrea Glorioso, (Tue Sep 28, 11:04 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Daniel James, (Wed Sep 29, 3:01 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Andrea Glorioso, (Thu Sep 30, 3:23 pm)
Re: [Consortium] Re: Linux audio workstations, Sili Attila, (Thu Sep 30, 6:54 pm)