On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:40 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
> Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote : "We need to start thinking about the function
Seems that belongs on the consortium list and shouldn't be on LAD and
> We would like to support maintained and moderated namespaces adopted by
I'm not sure what you are talking about here and highly suspect others
will be even more puzzled. Balancing?
Regarding namespaces (nice example of coder speak not suitable for a
general audience), I see it as a problem that linuxaudio.org web
presence is so fractured already.
> ..and we're not going to stop there.
Consider conference.linuxaudio.org or conf.linuxaudio.org. Redundant
redundancy department / cryptic abbrev. ;)
I actually think portal shouldn't exist. Should be just a list of links
reachable from linuxaudio.org . Like it is, but the link name "Portal"
doesn't cut it. Maybe "Ressources"?
> We're urgently looking for 2-5 Content Maintainers (and Guitarists) so
I suspect writing a long and partly confusing email while assuming
everyone already knows what this is all about and what you want to
accomplish is not the best way to invite contributors.
> Besides in the longer term we're looking for volunteers to summarize or
One of the URLs will be dropped? Which one? I though one is an open wiki
for content that is not necessarily tied to single applications and the
other a directory of linux audio applications?
Ah yes, the fragmentation. _Hidden_ resources are great for Indiana
Jones style explorers, I guess? ;)
I would rather drop old material to have a chance of introducing
something structured, where a newcomer would know where to start and had
a chance of finding stuff without using a pit lamp.
thorwil's design for free software:
Consortium mailing list