RE: [Consortium] RE: re: VST licensing progress

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <consortium@...>
Date: Saturday, November 4, 2006 - 11:20 am

> Would it be possible to compile the headers for the VST separately, and


AFAIK, this would still require each end-user to deal with downloading SDK
from Steinberg before compiling the lib. So, yes, it would make it easier
when dealing with multiple VST-dependent apps, but it would still not
alleviate the overhead like the arrangement we are currently hoping for. In
addition, it would prevent distributions from pre-packaging the lib making
the out-of-box experience likely less "polished" (although granted, we could
shrink-wrap the entire process via some kind of an user-friendly
post-install process). Perhaps this could be our plan "C"?

Anyone else care to comment?


Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Consortium] OSS competence center, Andreas Kuckartz, (Tue Feb 3, 3:39 am)
[Consortium] RE: re: VST licensing progress, Ashton Snelgrove, (Sat Nov 4, 6:25 am)
Re: [Consortium] RE: re: VST licensing progress, Chris Cannam, (Sat Nov 4, 7:43 pm)
RE: [Consortium] RE: re: VST licensing progress, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat Nov 4, 11:20 am)