Re: [Consortium] linux audio base djcj linux-sound apps and midi page etc...

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Chris Cannam <cannam@...>
Cc: <consortium@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2004 - 1:18 am

On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 18:51, Chris Cannam wrote:

I'm not suggesting an end-user portal at all. And it shouldn't be about
'pro-audio'. It should be about audio in general. See how ALSA has put
pro and consumer audio cards into one bag. That's because the
limitations of MME vs. ASIO, WDM or GSI had disappeared.
To me it's not about pro-audio and consumer-audio cards anymore. It's
about higher quality cards and lower-quality cards.
The same goes for software. There's no such thing as $1000 for pro audio
software when it comes to Linux Audio software.

What i'm suggesting is that we should build upon those values we already
have. LAD is definitely one of them. There's a set of mailing lists
where people virtually meet each other and discuss various things.
Those are all Linux Audio mailing lists.
LAD has been here on the internet for 7 years which means *a lot*.
It's a traditional place. It's a Linux Audio place just like LAU or LAA.
You're trying to promote JACK but JACK was born on LAD. LADSPA was born
on LAD aswell.

www.linuxaudio.org should be a website

where developers can find:
* a place for discussion - LAD
* news - projects, events, other developer community related stuff
that's LAA redirected to front page.
* developer documentation
* their prefered project

and where users can find:
* a place for discussion - LAU
* news - new applications and new versions of applications, community
news
* user documentation
* their prefered application

It's Linux Audio that needs promotion.

Marek

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Fri Nov 3, 12:05 pm)
Re: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Daniel James, (Fri Nov 3, 4:34 pm)
RE: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Fri Nov 3, 8:26 pm)
Re: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Daniel James, (Fri Nov 3, 8:47 pm)
RE: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Paul Davis, (Fri Nov 3, 8:33 pm)
RE: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Fri Nov 3, 8:49 pm)
RE: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Leonard Ritter, (Fri Nov 3, 10:39 pm)
RE: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Sat Nov 4, 11:16 am)
RE: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Leonard Ritter, (Sat Nov 4, 7:23 pm)
Re: [Consortium] re: VST licensing progress, Chris Cannam, (Fri Nov 3, 10:51 pm)
[Consortium] [OT] Re: linux audio base djcj linux-sound apps..., Joern Nettingsmeier, (Tue Feb 3, 1:24 am)
Re: [Consortium] Re: [OT] Re: linux audio base , Chris Cannam, (Tue Feb 3, 2:09 am)
Re: [Consortium] Re: [OT] Re: linux audio , Chris Cannam, (Tue Feb 3, 2:19 am)
Re: [Consortium] linux audio base djcj linux-sound apps and ..., Marek Peteraj, (Tue Feb 3, 1:18 am)
Re: [Consortium] linux audio base djcj linux-sound , Chris Cannam, (Tue Feb 3, 1:58 am)