Re: [Consortium] GStreamer and Pro-audio

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <consortium@...>

Subject: Re: [Consortium] GStreamer and Pro-audio

Date: Monday, February 2, 2004 - 10:09 pm

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 03:59:02 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:

quoted text

> Hi,
> I just thought I send the list this link to a document written by Andy
> Wingo about GStreamer and where we stand in regards to pro-audio.
> The doc is a mix of where we are/what we are focusing on.

Interesting, but he doesnt mention the part of gstreamer that truely
problematic for "pro" audio - synchronisation.

I agree that "pro" audio is a horrible term - when peopel call software
"pro" I'm always inclined to think they have an inferiority ciomplex.

- Steve

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[Consortium] GStreamer and Pro-audio, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller..., (Mon Feb 2, 9:50 pm)

RE: [Consortium] Call for a redesign of the Made in Linux Vo..., Ivica Ico Bukvic, (Fri Nov 3, 8:30 pm)

Re: [Consortium] GStreamer and Pro-audio, Steve Harris, (Mon Feb 2, 10:09 pm)

linuxaudio.org

Re: [Consortium] GStreamer and Pro-audio