On Monday 02 February 2004 09:37, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Ah, I dunno. I had been thinking perhaps of making one of the other
Hmm, I'd say a no to both of those. Firstly everyone knows how to use Google
and people don't actually type in links anymore, do they? Secondly, why undo
all the good "it's not just for geeks" image by promoting the geek side of it
all? Geeks will know where to look and how to help out - if they don't then
they're not very good geeks.
I do think there should be a more in depth flier perhaps outlining some core
apps in more detail (and lifting a few quotes from websites) and also perhaps
adumbrating an example setup - piece for piece - against a (say) Windows
setup. So you could have a tick list of things to do to get you up and
running with a Linux Audio system. If I was a musician or music tech looking
to move over to Linux I'd want to see a list of concrete reasons why I should
be moving and examples of how I can achieve this. To know it can be done is
enough - that's why Ron's (and others) setup is of so much interest to
Whatever though - I have already nailed my up my colours as a firm believer in
Linux Audio as a viable commercial platform (at some point or other, on some
scale or other) so I do tend to veer onto the hopelessly salesmanny pitch.
I think it's worth shouting about in a commercial sense mainly because that
is the language that people understand - if you say it's cool and it's free
people tend to mistrust it. "What's the catch? You must have to be a brain
surgeon to fly it."
An even more paranoid point along the same lines is that if our stand is
popular then other firms (who've paid full price for their stands) may be
keen to point out any flaw in our arguments to keep people wary of Linux
I'm mainly playing devil's advocate here of course.