> > 1. "Linux has to small a share of the market to
OS X isn't going to be available for the vast majority of hardware
while Apple avoids confronting Microsoft. They are a pet competitor -
MS even invested US$150m in Apple to keep it afloat a few years back.
So where Intel/AMD or most embedded systems are concerned, OS X isn't
relevant to market share. (Apple has 100% of the OS X market though!)
> > 2. "we're waiting for a DAW/Sequencer like X and then
I expect proprietary software companies are watching to see if any of
them jump first. My own opinion is that it's a mistake waiting for
the likes of Steinberg to port software like Cubase, because the best
new software will probably follow a different paradigm. Stanton Final
Scratch, for example, was nothing like existing DJ software.
> 3. "Linux users want everything for free"
That is something I hear from people, and to a certain extent it's
true - free beer software inevitably attracts mean users. (Warez
attracts far more tightwad users, but that's another matter).
Those companies offering non-free-beer applications for Linux, libre
or not, will have to consider if they are trying to sell audio
software to existing Linux users, or Linux software to existing audio
users. At the moment, the former market is more than catered for by
free-beer libre software, so I'm not surprised they don't see a
I think it's probably too early to count a significant number of
users, but the number of developers might be more important at this
stage. Celebrity users are probably more helpful than statistics for
advocacy purposes, especially if the numbers are small.
I'm not convinced we can make a case based on the size of the user
base, but let's not forget that most marketing types are constantly
looking for 'the next big thing'. That's like to be an angle we can