>> > It represents the linux audio developers, the linux audio users,>> > linux audio applications/projects.
Joern, the problem is - a webring won't solve the fragmentation of linux audio on the web.
See www.jabber.org and www.jabberstudio.org to get an idea of what i was talking about.
Using a domain name with a crucial keyword for a consortium while leaving crucial information placed all over the net isn't going to help us.
Grep in your archives for my email from july, august or september.
> for the time being, i think it's best not to bring the subject to> LAD again, but in the long run, once linuxaudio.org has more clearly> defined itself, i'd like to discuss the web ring idea on the list> and see what can be done.
I'm not sure what are the missing points on the TODO list for
"defining" the consortium. Daniel?
Lots more than you might think, Andrea. There are lots of legal issues involved. I don't want to go into more details at the moment.
But a non-profit organisation consisting of natural members - members of a community is a model that has been adopted in many oss communities.
See fsf, gnome, xiph, X.org.
to quote http://www.newsforge.com/software/04/01/23/0020201.shtml?tid=130&tid=132...
"X.org no longer "the X consortium" -- is now a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization."